Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of C.L.S.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1997No. C5-96-641PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Citing the requirements of Minn.Stat. § 260.126, subd. 2 (1994), appellant C.L.S. contends that the juvenile court lost its jurisdiction because an extended jurisdiction designation hearing did not take place within 90 days after the petition for that relief was filed. Appellant also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for an extended jurisdiction juvenile designation. We vacate the untimely designation, but without prejudice.
FACTS
In a delinquency petition filed on October 9, 1996, C.L.S. was charged with a felony-level offense, burglary in the third degree, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Matter of Welfare of DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In Re the Welfare of S.J.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re the Welfare of C.T.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re M.I.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Welfare of D.M.D.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re the Welfare of H.S.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re Welfare of D.M.D.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000