Rogers v. Noel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Haskett County; Malcolm E. Rosser,, Judge. Action by J. C. Rogers against Chaney Noel and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
It is first urged that the demurrer to the defendants’ answer was improperly overruled because of a negative pregnant in said answer, wherein it is alleged: “Defendants further say that it is not true that plaintiff purchased said land from their father Ben Noel for the sum of $1,135.” It will not be necessary to consider this objection, for the reason that the answer elsewhere sufficiently puts in issue all of the material allegations in the plaintiff’s petition, and therefore the demurrer, being general, was properly overruled.
The material facts in this case are very…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pickering v. LomaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lykins v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Lewis v. ClementsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Howard v. FarrarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Simmons v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maroney v. TannehillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- F. B. Collins Inv. Co. of Clinton v. BeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Tirey v. DarnealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Murrow Indian Orphans' Home v. McClendonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- United States v. WatasheCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.