Legal Opinion
Jayel Corp. v. Cochran
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 20, 2006No. 05-1005PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
The Jayel Corporation purchased an undeveloped plot of land in Benton County and built a residential subdivision called Carriage Square. John and Janice Fryer operated a tree farm on an adjoining piece of land. The Fryers claimed that their land incurred substantial damage as a result of flooding caused by Jayel’s development. The Fryers hired Tamra Cochran &emdash; an attorney with the law firm Cochran & Croxton, P.A. &emdash; to pursue a legal action against Jayel.
On July 11, 2002, Cochran, acting on behalf of the Fryers, filed suit against Jayel for nuisance and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wallace v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- In Re El San Juan Hotel Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Marshall J. KaganCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Wells v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Swofford v. StaffordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rucker v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Kerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Crockett v. C.A.G. Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Ruth R. Remmel Revocable Trust v. Regions Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Lane v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.