Legal Opinion

Lanham v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2010No. 60A01-1003-CR-114PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

David A. Lanham ("Lanham") appeals his convictions for Possession of Marijuana, as a Class D felony, 1 and Possession of Paraphernalia, a Class A infraction. 2 We affirm. 3

Issue

Lanham presents the sole issue of whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant, claiming that the search warrant was supported only by uncorroborated hearsay.

Facts and Procedural History

M.B., then fourteen years old and Lan-ham's neighbor, visited Lanham's residence during the evening hours of February 7, 2006. MB.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Washington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Jaggers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. SpillersIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cynthia Sugg v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Purvi Patel v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Meghan E. Price v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Alonzo R. Weekly v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API