Legal Opinion

Beckett v. City of Petaluma

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1915No. S. F. No. 6531PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The action herein was begun by the plaintiffs to quiet their title to a parcel of land against any and all claims of the defendant. The plaintiffs claimed title under William M. Francis. The parcel of land in controversy is a tract 148 feet square at the corner of Bremen and Jefferson streets, in the city of Petaluma.

In defense the city alleged that it has been in the uninterrupted adverse possession of the property for more than twelve years before the action was begun and had paid all taxes thereon during that period; in brief, that it had acquired title thereto by prescription, and that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Sherman v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Mills v. Forest Preserve DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Bernstein v. DodikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Patchett v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API