Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Greene
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 19, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2012-0119PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Though little remembered now, InPhonic was once the largest online retader of cell phones and related services in the United States. In this civil-enforcement aetion, the Securities and Exchange Commission alleges that a senior vice president of InPhonic, Defendant Len’Familant, and the president of an InPhonic supplier, Defendant Paul Greene, ran a scheme to conceal InPhonic’s deteriorating financial state: Greene directed his employees to issue unearned memos of credit to InPhonic^ which used the sham credits to pad its financial reports,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Insight Systems Corp., and Centerscope Technologies, Inc. v. the United States 12-863c andUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- ['U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. RPM Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.