Legal Opinion
United States v. Leo Sure Chief, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 2006No. 05-30214PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Leo Sure Chief, Jr., challenges his conviction for aggravated sexual abuse on two grounds: (1) the district court erred by refusing to dismiss the indictment because the applicable statute of limitations had run, and (2) the district court erred by limiting the evidence that Defendant was allowed to present at trial. We hold that the statute of limitations had not expired and that Defendant suffered no prejudice from the exclusion of the proffered evidence. We therefore affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In approximately 1997, when B.V. was in the fourth…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. George Michael ShipseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Fred S. PangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Michael H. Boulware, United States of America v. Michael H. BoulwareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Bridges v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Lopez de VictoriaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- Weingarten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- United States v. CoutentosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.