Legal Opinion

United States v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 28, 2018No. 17-2053PPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant David Miller pleaded guilty to violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (a), by transporting his thirteen-year-old 1 adopted daughter across state lines in 1995 for immoral sexual purposes. The defendant had not yet been charged and the limitations period for his Mann Act violation was still open when Congress elongated the statute of limitations in 2003. "The mills of justice grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine," Vineberg v. Bissonnette , 548 F.3d 50 , 59 (1st Cir. 2008), and the government eventually charged the defendant with the Mann Act…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. TkhilaishviliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Flete-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Padilla-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. PietteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  5. United States v. Santana-DonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API