Legal Opinion

United States v. George Michael Shipsey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 2004No. 20-35739PublishedCited by 153 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINER, Senior District Judge:

I

George Michael Shipsey appeals his conviction on charges of mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341), wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), and theft from an employee pension fund (18 U.S.C. § 664), arising from the diversion of construction loan proceeds. Previously, another panel of this court had vacated his first conviction on these charges, United States v. Shipsey, 190 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.1999) (“Shipsey I”), and remanded for a new trial. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331; this court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by153 opinions

  1. United States v. Stuart RommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. SineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API