Severson v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Sam and Albert Severson, as copartners, operated a farm and a fleet of milk trucks. They employed seven or eight truck drivers, who, in addition to hauling milk, did general farm work. They were paid by the month, and received room and board at the farm. Although driving a *171milk truck was ordinarily a one-man job, it was customary for the drivers to go along to assist other drivers at times, which practice was known to the Severson brothers, who tacitly approved of it.
The truck drivers had their own routes, and usually collected milk from the farms on their respective routes in the morning and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frint Motor Car Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Radtke Bros. & Korsch Co. v. RutzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Brienen v. Wisconsin Public Service Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Sheboygan Airways, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Olson Rug Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Neese v. State Medical Society of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Grant County Service Bureau, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.