Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Schwartz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1927No. 20088. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action for damages resulting from the negligence of the driver of a taxicab, who injured appellant Leo Murphy, while he was engaged as a track oiler in the employ of the city of Seattle on its munic ipal street ear system. He was injured while engaged at his work at the intersection of Madison and Post streets in that city. The nonsuit was granted on the ground that he was on the plant of his employer at the time he wa,s injured, and therefore had no right of election to sue the negligent third parties who caused the injuries, hut must seek…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Zenor v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Carlson v. MockWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Diblasio v. HunterWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Shockey v. Royal Baking Powder Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Olson v. SternWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Poor v. Incorporated Town of DuncombeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Wade v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Matheny v. Edwards Ice Machine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API