Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Mock

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1918No. 14749PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered September 14, 1917, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained by a street railway employee struck by an automobile.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This action was brought by tbe appellant against tbe respondents, Mock and wife, to recover damages for personal injuries. Trial was bad before tbe court sitting with a jury, and at tbe close of tbe appellant’s case, upon motion of tbe respondents, a judgment of nonsuit was entered. From this judgment, appellant brings tbe case to this court upon appeal.

Tbe appellant, in bis supplemental complaint, alleges, that be was employed as a track oiler by tbe Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Company, and that, while engaged in tbe duties of bis employment on tbe south track of tbe company’s line…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stertz v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Ross v. Erickson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. MeeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Meese v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Zenor v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. King v. Union Oil CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bruce v. McAdooMontana Supreme Court · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API