Legal Opinion

Shockey v. Royal Baking Powder Manufacturing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1926No. 19622. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This action was instituted by the appellant, Shockey, against the respondents, Royal Baking Powder Manufacturing Company, Royal Distributing Company, and E. G. Fredbloom, to recover for personal injuries. On the trial of the cause after issue joined, and after the attorney for the appellant had made his opening statement to the jury, the respondents moved to dismiss the action, basing the motion on the pleadings in the cause and the opening statement. This motion the trial court granted, entering a judgment in accordance with the motion. The appeal is from the judgment so entered.

At the time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stertz v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. City of Chicago v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Zenor v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Carlson v. MockWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Diblasio v. HunterWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Murphy v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Scott v. Pacific Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Wade v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Matheny v. Edwards Ice Machine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API