Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Department of Highways

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 6, 1961No. 19233PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

By this writ of error Joseph P. Ruth and The Ruth Company seek review of an award of $4,300 in a condemnation suit brought by the highway department of the State of Colorado. The Ruth Company is a corporation owned and controlled by Ruth; for convenience the plaintiffs in error will be referred to simply as Ruth.

The position of Ruth at the trial and before this Court is that the condemnation award is grossly inadequate, that in addition to the $4,300 awarded there was damage to the residue in the approximate amount of $100,000. He contends that certain rulings of the trial court on matters of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  2. City of Tulsa v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. City & County of Denver v. LyttleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  4. Farmers' Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  5. Loloff v. SterlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Department of Highways v. SchulhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. Poudre Valley Rural Electric Ass'n v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. PelletierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State Highway Commission of Wyoming v. Triangle Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. HayutinColorado Court of Appeals · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API