Medlock v. 1985 Ford F-150 Pick Up Vin 1FTDF15YGFNA22049
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Chief Justice:
We are presented with the question of whether an owner of property subject to forfeiture pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. §§ 44-53-520 and -530 (Supp. 1991)1 is entitled to a jury trial. The forfeiture judge held that the owner of the property sub*70ject to forfeiture in this action, Robert Earl Childers, was not entitled to a jury trial. We reverse.
I. FACTS
Childers was convicted in January 1990 for conspiracy to traffic in illegal narcotics. A forfeiture hearing was held in circuit court in December 1990 to confirm the forfeiture of certain property, designated above as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Commonwealth v. One 1972 Chevrolet VanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- In re Forfeiture of 1978 Chevrolet Van Vin: CGD1584167858Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
- C. W. Matthews Contracting Co. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Ex parte KeelerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. One 1990 Honda AccordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Helms v. Tennessee Department of SafetyTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Holley v. Mount Vernon Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Mims Amusement Co. v. South Carolina Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.