Legal Opinion

Landrigan v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 5, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injury and property damage alleged to have resulted from a collision on June 19, 1947, of the plaintiff’s truck with an electric street car of the Boston Elevated Railway Company on Commonwealth Avenue in Boston. Metropolitan Transit Authority has been substituted as defendant for the Boston Elevated Railway Company and is hereinafter referred to as the defendant. In its answer the defendant alleged that the plaintiff was *26not in the exercise of due care and that the truck involved in the accident was illegally registered. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burns v. WinchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Kilduff v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Furtado v. HumphreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Glennon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Larkin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Portanova v. Somerset Hotel Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API