Legal Opinion
Furtado v. Humphrey
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 27, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
These are three actions of tort tried together to a jury. In the first two cases the plaintiffs, as individuals, sought recovery for personal injuries sustained in a collision between a motor truck, belonging to the plaintiff partnership, and a touring car, owned and operated by the defendant, at the corner of Broadway and Washington Street in Taunton, Massachusetts, on February 16, 1931, at about six o’clock in the morning. The third action, as amended, was brought by the aforesaid partnership to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by its truck in the said collision.
At the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Crompton v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Bacon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Rand v. FarquharMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Liddell v. Middlesex Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Burns v. WinchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Bridges v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Crean v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Dunn v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Cochran v. M & M Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.