Legal Opinion

Glennon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 28, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is an action to recover compensation for personal injuries, alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the negligence of a motorman in the employ of the defendant in operating one of its trolley cars. The case comes before us on the exception of the defendant to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict.

The injuries were received about three o’clock on the afternoon of a September day, on a main street in Everett. The plaintiff was standing in a tipcart drawn up parallel to the right hand curb. No question is made as to his due care. The only point to be decided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rizzittelli v. VestineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Lovett v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. O'Brien v. Blue Hill Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Boyle v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Phillips v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Larkin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Riley v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Behmer v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Maderios v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Diamato v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API