Legal Opinion

Pope v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1939No. 2121PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Chief Justice.

This case arises under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation law of this State. The district court of Laramie County made its award of compensation in favor of, and on account of injuries sustained by, the respondent Pope, who may be hereinafter occasionally mentioned as the “claimant” or the “employee.” The award was resisted by the appellant, Safeway Stores, Inc., a Nevada corporation, which may briefly be designated herein as the “employer” or the “defendant.” The cause was brought here by the direct appeal method of procedure to obtain a review of the record…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Baldwin v. ScullionWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Blake v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Tarr v. Hecla Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fuhs v. SwensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Parnell v. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Compensation Case of Wright v. Wyoming State Training SchoolWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Randell v. Wyoming State Treasurer Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Williams v. Northern Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API