Legal Opinion
United States v. Almaraz
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 23, 2002No. 01-2049PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Ruben Almaraz appeals from his conviction and sentence for engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848. He claims the government failed to present sufficient evidence he organized, supervised, or managed five other persons during the course of the three drug violations for which the jury returned a guilty verdict or at any other time. This case presents our first oppor tunity to interpret the continuing criminal enterprise statute in light of Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813, 119 S.Ct. 1707, 143 L.Ed.2d 985 (1999). We must decide…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Femedeer v. HaunCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Eusebio Escobar-De JesusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. VerbickasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Bryan BostickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.