Legal Opinion
United States v. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2014No. 12-5154PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Stanley Hill appeals following his conviction on several charges related to the robbery of a bank. During trial, Charles Jones, a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), testified as an expert. Agent Jones stated that he was trained in “special tactics and ways to identify [] deception in statements and truths in statements” and that in his opinion, many of Stanley’s 1 answers were not worthy of credence and “[did] not make sense.” Jones claimed that Stanley displayed evasive behaviors “common among the criminal element to keep law enforcement at…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Gonzalez-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Anthony Damian AzureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Medina-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Pioneer Centres Holding Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust v. Alerus Financial, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. VannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.