Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. Commission on State Mandates

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1998No. C026835Published

1Opinion of the Court

64 Cal.App.4th 1190 (1998)

CITY OF RICHMOND, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

COMMISSION ON STATE MANDATES, Defendant and Respondent; DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Docket No. C026835.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

May 28, 1998.

COUNSEL

Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, Robert J. Sullivan, Stephen P. Wilman, John T. Kennedy and Scott N. Yamaguchi for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Dwight L. Herr, County Counsel (Santa Cruz), Ronald R. Ball, City Attorney (Carlsbad), Michael G. Colantuono, City Attorney (Cudahay), William B. Conners, City Attorney (Monterey),…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. County of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Carmel Valley Fire Protection v. State of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API