Legal Opinion

Jerko v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 158PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Walling,

This suit is the outgrowth of a crossing accident. Mahoning Street, extending through the Borough of Punxsutawney in an easterly and westerly direction, is crossed at grade and practically at right angles by the Walston branch of the defendant’s railroad, at what is known as the West End crossing. On the morning of July 6, 1920, plaintiff’s husband, Mike Jerko, with ten other men, was being conveyed easterly along this street in an autotruck, as a passenger for hire, by one George Armstrong. Five passengers were seated on each side of the truck and one sat in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Minnich v. Easton Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Hill v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Hugo v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Dunlap v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Anstine v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Janeway v. Lafferty Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Haller v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Ellsworth v. LauthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API