Hugo v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 182, Qct. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Feb. T., 1910, No. 374, in favor of defendant n. o. v. in case of Leona Hugo v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. Trespass to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 182, Qct. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Feb. T., 1910, No. 374, in favor of defendant n. o. v. in case of Leona Hugo v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. Trespass to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband. Before Reid, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court, The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $3,000.00. The court subsequently entered judgment for defendant n. o. v. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was the action of the court in entering judgment for defendant n. o. v. — The case was…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Elkin,
At the trial this case was submitted to the jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $3,000.00. Subsequently, judgment non obstante veredicto for defendant upon the whole record was directed to be entered by the learned court below. From the judgment so entered this appeal was taken. There is but *596one assignment of error and that raises the single question whether upon the whole record the court was warranted in entering judgment for defendant in disregard of the verdict of the jury. In other words, under the testimony introduced at the trial,…
2Cited by28 opinions
- Geelen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Kindt v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Cubitt v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Saxman v. McCormickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.