Legal Opinion

Tremayne v. Striepeke

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1968No. Civ. 31697PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Defendant, plaintiff’s former husband, appeals from a judgment in a declaratory relief action which determined that under a property settlement agreement and a supplement thereto, executed by the parties in connection with their divorce proceedings, he was obligated to continue support payments to plaintiff for a period of ten years and thirty days ending on January 21, 1972, notwithstanding her remarriage in 1963. The judgment was also against defendant on his cross-complaint which sought $1,200, his agreed share of the proceeds from the sale of certain realty; however, since the trial court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Plumer v. PlumerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Hilton v. McNittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. San Diego Construction Co. v. MannixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of NicolaidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. In Re Marriage of ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. In Re Marriage of WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Forgy v. ForgyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Matthews v. MatthewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API