Legal Opinion

Mineer v. Williams

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided February 3, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-187PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

BERTELSMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of defendants to dismiss. Inasmuch as statements at the hearing were considered, the motion will be treated as one for summary judgment as well. Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b). Since the cause of action for invasion of privacy does not survive after death and the requisite elements for intentional infliction of emotional distress are absent, the motion must be granted and the complaint dismissed.

FACTS

In October of 1997, a seventeen-year-old woman, Erica Fraysure, disappeared on a Friday night in Brooksville,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tom PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Craft v. RiceKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  4. McCall v. Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Paul Mik, Jr. v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Nicholas v. NicholasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Valadez v. Emmis CommunicationsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. Holland v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Lee v. HefnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API