Calhoun v. Brendle, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant Rodney Calhoun appeals from a judgment of the trial court granting an injunction in favor of plaintiff Brendle, Inc., in this action to enforce a non-competition covenant.
The facts out of which this proceeding arises are largely undisputed. The parties simply disagree as to whether those facts will support an injunction to enforce a covenant not to compete. Therefore, we review not the trial court's findings of fact, but its application of law to those findings. Samford v. First Alabama Bank ofMontgomery, N.A., 431 So.2d 146 (Ala. 1983); Home Indemnity Co.v. Reed Equipment Co., 381…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Home Indem. Co. v. Reed Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- James S. Kemper & Co. v. Cox & AssociatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Hill v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Cullman Broadcasting Co. v. BosleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- DeVoe v. CheathamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Clark v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Berney Office SolutionsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Corson v. Universal Door Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Roberson v. C.P. Allen Constr. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.