Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Berney Office Solutions
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney Bowes, Inc. ("Pitney"), appeals the summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of Berney Office Solutions ("Berney"). Because of the continued pendency of other claims between and among these parties and others, the trial court made the summary judgment final and appealable pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala.R.Civ.P. We affirm.
In the Montgomery County Circuit Court, Thomas W. Morris sued his former employer Pitney for an injunction against the enforcement of a noncompete agreement he had executed before he began his employment with Pitney and for a declaratory judgment that the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cherry, Bekaert & Holland v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- SYSTEM DYNAMICS INTERN., INC. v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Dobbs v. Shelby County Economic & Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Odess v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Robinson v. Computer Servicenters, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hollis v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Hollis v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Blackwood v. City of HancevilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Benchmark Medical Holdings, Inc. v. Rehab Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
- CLARK SUBSTATIONS LLC v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.