Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Tee

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 12, 1971No. 23,440PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Having entered pleas of guilty, the appellant was convicted of violating Articles 134 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 934 and 892. Two specifications charged under the first Article alleged the wrongful possession of heroin and the unlawful introduction of this narcotic into his company at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. A single specification charged under Article 92 alleges:

“Specification: In that Private First Class Daniel Webster Tee . . . did . . . on or about 28 January 1970, violate a lawful general regulation, to wit: paragraph 4,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. United States v. ChilcoteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. GohagenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. VerdiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. CuffeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. CannonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. DykesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
  5. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API