Legal Opinion · Dissent

Turner v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 22, 1954No. C. D. 1665Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Ford, Judge:

According to the official report of the collector of customs, submitted on customs Form 4297, “The merchandise covered by the annexed. protest was classified in liquidation as food cutting machines under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and assessed with duty at the rate of 27K% ad valorem.”

The factual situation in this case is not in dispute. My disagreement with my associates is based entirely upon the construction which they have placed on paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Ex Parte Public National Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Frankfeld v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. United States v. SewardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  5. Comey v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API