Legal Opinion

Comey v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 26, 1913No. 1059PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 30415 (T. D. 32926).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

These importations are of black hatters’ plush assessed for duty under the provisions of paragraph 399 of the tariff act of 1909 as *286silk plush. Protestants claimed, the merchandise dutiable under the provisions of paragraph 477 of said act, which reads:

477. Plush, black, known commercially as hatters’ plush, composed of silk, or of silk and cotton, such as is used exclusively for making men’s hats, ten per centum ad valorem.

The identical merchandise and the appropriate paragraph under which the same was classifiable for duty were the subject of decision by this court in Comey & Johnson Co. v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Comey & Johnson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Turner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. United States v. Nichols Copper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API