Legal Opinion

United States v. Seward

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 26, 1918No. 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8167 (T. D. 37622). [Oral argument Oct. 31, 1918, by Mr.°Hanson and Mr. Neumann.]

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

The importation was of an expressed oil of tea seeds imported from China. The case is brought here upon the question of its proper classification for import duty purposes under the provisions of paragraph 498 of the free list of the tariff act of 1913, reading:

498. Grease, fats, vegetable tallow, and oils (excepting fish oils), not chemically compounded, such as are commonly used in soap making or in wire drawing, or for stuffing or dressing leather, not specially provided for in this section.

The predecessor paragraphs to this in the tariff acts of 1897 (par. 568) and 1909 (par. 580) were in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frankfeld v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reichard Coulston, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  2. Turner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. United States v. Nichols Copper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  4. United States v. Vandegrift & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API