Legal Opinion
Douglass v. Hurwitz Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 10, 1956No. 16326PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
The trial judge makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiff is a 65-year old man who was employed by defendant as the driver of a horse and parcel post wagon, of the type described in paragraph 2 below, from 1942 to June 10, 1945, and from August 11, 1952, to October 13, 1953. His duties included storing the wagon and removing it from storage, care of the horse, and harnessing it to the wagon, as well as driving. He can only read numbers but can sign his name. He did not *30know how many hours there were between 5 A. M. and 5…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- F. W. Stock & Sons, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Pearson v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- United States v. BrewardSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kenneth J. Hill v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Reich v. Southern New England Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Blain v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1971
- Nerseth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989