Legal Opinion

Nerseth v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 24, 1989No. 102-88CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NAPIER, Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ overtime compensation claims for lack of jurisdiction and failure to maintain an actionable claim under RUSCC 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(4). Defendant asserts that plaintiffs’ claims for evening overtime compensation are barred by the applicable statute of limitations, while plaintiffs’ mealtime compensation claims warrant dismissal under United States Claims Court Rule 12(b)(4) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Weber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Hasken v. City of LouisvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API