Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Rice
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided May 24, 1972No. 6 Div. 59PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.
This case was previously assigned to another judge and was only recently reassigned to the writer.
Claims for unemployment compensation were filed by 178 employees of Central Foundry Company of Tuscaloosa. After denial of compensation by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations and the Board of Appeals of the Department, appeals were filed for trial de novo in the Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa County as provided by Title 26, Section 214(A), 1940 Code of Alabama as amended.
By agreement and stipulation, five of the cases were selected as representative of all,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lanyon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Department of Industrial Relations v. DrummondAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
- Cudd v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Usher v. Department of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Achenbach v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clary v. Central Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Bedford H. Clary v. Central Foundry Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Holmes v. RiceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Pullman Standard v. GambleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979