Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 29, 1974No. 886-3PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*949Green, C.J.

— Plaintiff, Northern Pacific Railway Company, brought this action against the defendant, Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District, to recover damages caused by the escape of water from defendant’s irrigation canal. Trial to the court upon stipulated facts resulted in a judgment in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Two errors are addressed to the court’s findings and conclusions: (1) the failure to allow a recovery under the indemnity provisions of a 1913 permit; and (2) the failure to find and hold that the damage to plaintiff’s property was the result of a constitutional…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Woolfolk Chemical Works, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. Ross Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. National Cylinder Gas Division of Chemetron Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dirk v. Amerco Marketing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lone Star Gas Co. v. Mexia Oil & Gas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Cayne v. Washington Trust BankDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API