Continental Casualty Co. v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment construing the indemnity provisions of a written contract.
Four parties are involved on this appeal: Continental Casualty Company, a foreign corporation; Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, a municipal corporation; General Construction Company, a corporation; and Travelers Indemnity Company, a foreign corporation. For brevity, we refer to the parties as Continental, Metro, General Construction, and Travelers.
The facts were presented to the trial court on written stipulation of counsel.
By competitive bid, Metro (defendant and respondent) awarded…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buscaglia v. Owens-Corning FiberglasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Ross Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
- Ettor v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Washington Tire & Rubber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
- McDowell v. AUSTIN COMPANYWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. National Cylinder Gas Division of Chemetron Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Erickson Paving Co. v. Yardley Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Parks v. Western Washington Fair Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.