Legal Opinion
Dirk v. Amerco Marketing Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1977No. 44372PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
This is an appeal of a declaratory judgment accepted on certification from the Court of Appeals. The issues presented involve the interpretation to be given to an indemnification clause in the U-Haul dealership contract to which appellant Vitalis Dirk and respondent are parties.
Appellant Vitalis Dirk operated a service station in Moses Lake, Washington. In 1971, he entered into a U- Haul dealership contract with respondent Amerco Marketing Company of Spokane, and became an authorized U-Haul dealer for the Moses Lake area.
Dirk was instructed to tell anyone renting U-Haul equipment from him…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
- Griffiths v. Henry Broderick, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Fleming v. Stoddard Wendle Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Tucci & Sons, Inc. v. Carl T. Madsen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Brown v. Prime Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Key Air, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Calkins v. Lorain Division of Koehring Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Tateosian v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.