Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Woolfolk Chemical Works, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
Defendant urges as the first point in support of its motion that it did not assume any of the obligations or liabilities of the dissolved corporation and was not its successor or assign under the contracts containing the indemnity agreements. Plaintiff railway does not urge that the indemnity agreement was a covenant running with the land rather than a personal undertaking. See Atlanta Consol. Street R. Co. v. Jackson, 108 Ga. 634, 638 (34 SE 184); Waycross Air-Line R. Co. v. Southern Pine Co., 115 Ga. 7, 10 (41 SE 271); Willcox v. Kehoe, 124 Ga. 484 (52 SE 896, 4 LRA (NS)…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Colonial Stores, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Travelers Insurance v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Werbin & Tenenbaum, Inc. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Whisenhunt v. Allen Parker Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Long v. Jim Letts Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- American Legacy Foundation v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- FCM Group, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Norton v. First Federal SavingsArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Henderson v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.