Shadley v. Lloyds of London
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrennan, J.
¶ 1. Tim Stys, Pamela Stys, and Monticello Insurance Company (collectively referred to herein as "the Stys") appeal the judgment granting attorney fees to Gwen Shadley as the "successful party" under the language of the parties' house-moving contract. Shadley cross-appeals from the same judgment arguing that the trial court erred in: (1) construing two contract terms, "expected and ordinary stresses" and "risks of moving"; and (2) erroneously exercising its discretion in denying damages based on the same. We reverse the trial court's decision on attorney fees and remand the issue consistent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. NdinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Ford Motor Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- State v. CabanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Borchardt v. WilkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Gemini Capital Group, LLC v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
- Best Graphics Inc v. Bindery 1 IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025
- MPI Wright LLC v. Goodin CompanyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025
- Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.