Legal Opinion

Turnbow v. Job Service North Dakota

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1992No. Civ. 910203PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Job Service North Dakota ruled that Kevin Turnbow, doing business as Nodak Construction, was an employer in 1986, 1987, and 1988, and that certain services performed for Turnbow in those years were employment subject to unemployment compensation tax. Turnbow appealed, the district court affirmed, and Turnbow appealed to this court. We affirm.

Job Service began a proceeding to determine if payments made by Turnbow to certain workers were wages subject to job insurance taxes. Turnbow contended that he had no employees, only independent contractors. Job Service held an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. SchwalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Amerada Hess Corp. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Newland v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cass County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. BKU Enterprises, Inc. v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Rennich Ex Rel. Rennich v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API