Legal Opinion

Westerman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1978No. 75-3885PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge.

On July 14, 1973, a fire originating in the Macks Store in Edgefield, South Carolina, extensively damaged Scavens Men’s Shop located in an adjacent building. As a result, Nicholas J. Scavens brought a diversity action in federal district court seeking to recover his property damage from Macks Stores, Incorporated. Following a two day trial, a jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $21,957.58. The trial judge, however, entered an order granting the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, ruling that there was not sufficient evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. John S. Mays v. Pioneer Lumber Corporation, a West Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  3. Wratchford v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  4. Cranston Print Works Company, a Corporation v. Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  5. Hart v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Burton Viestenz v. Fleming Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Anderson v. Heron Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. In re General Motors Corporation Dex-Cool Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API