Legal Opinion

Wratchford v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1969No. 12140PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:

The principal question presented is whether, in the diversity jurisdiction, federal or state standards are to be applied by the Court in determining the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury. We hold that the federal standard applies, and that there was sufficient evidence on the question of proximate causation to go to the jury.

Preliminarily, we are met with the objection that the point is not properly before us, because at the time of the trial everyone assumed that the Maryland standard applied. This was understood by the District Court to require that when…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Wilbur L. LOVELACE, Appellant, v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  2. Jennie A. Mayer v. Gary Partners and Company, Limited, and K-Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Sakaria v. Trans World AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Vivian Mattison Morty Ronald Mattison v. Dallas Carrier CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Joel D. Davis, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API