Legal Opinion

Hart v. Doe

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 15, 1973No. 19677PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice:

This action was brought in Orangeburg County Court against “John Doe”, the unidentified driver of a motor vehicle, under the provisions of Secs. 46-750.34 and 46-750.35, supplement to the 1962 Co,de of Laws. Upon trial, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for both actual and punitive damages. Following the verdict, the defense made a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, or in the alternative, for a new trial. The motion for judgment non obstante veredicto was granted and plaintiff appeals.

On the morning of May 8, 1971, at approximately 11 o’clock, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. American Motorists Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. Nat'l Bank of Honea Path v. Barrett Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Waring v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hoeffner Ex Rel. Estate of Hoeffner v. CitadelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Clyburn v. Sumter County School District 17Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Berberich v. JackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Westerman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Brown v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API