Legal Opinion
Fenske v. Board of Administration
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 1980No. Civ. 4804PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOPPER, Acting P. J.
We are primarily concerned in this case with (1) whether California Constitution, article III, section 3.5 (hereinafter referred to as section 3.5) divests the superior court of jurisdiction to review questions concerning the constitutionality of statutes governing administrative agencies, and (2) the constitutionality of Government Code section 20020.
We conclude (1) that section 3.5 does not divest the superior court of jurisdiction to review such questions, and (2) that Government Code section 20020 is unconstitutional insofar as it purports to apply only to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Neary v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- American Drug Stores, Inc. v. StrohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Capitol Industries-EMI, Inc. v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Regents of University of California v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.