Inouye v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs and intervener in the amount of $84,968.38 in an action for wrongful death. The points raised on appeal are that the failure to instruct on assumption of risk constituted reversible error, and that the trial court committed reversible error in giving a certain formula instruction which did not include assumption of risk as one of the issues.
The facts, insofar as they are applicable to a determination of these points, are as follows:
Plaintiffs are the wife and children of decedent. Decedent was employed as foreman on the fruit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Mula v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Lein v. ParkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Granberg v. TurnhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Fonseca v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Beard v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Teixeira v. VerissimoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Kingery v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.