Legal Opinion

Burk v. Platt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 10,710PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Erom the Superior Court of Marion County.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

— In 1882 the appellant, a manned woman, and her copartner, Alfred M. Preston, purchased merchandise of the appellees, Emanuel Platt and Emil Trout-man. For the goods thus purchased Platt and Troutman ■obtained before a justice of the peace two judgments against the appellant and Preston. Transcripts of the judgments were filed in the office of the clerk of the Marion Circuit ■Court, and, the proper steps being taken, executions were issued and placed in the hands of the appellee Adams, as sheriff, and were by him levied upon the appellant’s real estate. A sale of such real estate being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burk v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. McDaniel v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Wagner v. EwingIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Young v. McFaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Anderson v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Morningstar v. HardwickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. In re DayDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API