Young v. McFadden
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— There is evidence tending to prove that the appellant employed the appellee to defend her husband, who was at the time in jail charged with having committed a crime, and that in payment of the fee agreed upon she executed the promissory note upon which the complaint is founded. The evidence also shows that the husband signed the note. The trial court instructed the jury as follows:
*255“ It was competent for the defendant Mrs. Young, for herself, to enter into a contract with the plaintiff McFadden to defend her husband frond the charge then alleged to be pending against him, and to execute a'…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bennett v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Rosa v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Arnold v. EnglemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Miller v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- McLead v. Ætna Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Haynes v. NowlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Sponhaur v. MalloyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Anderson v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Conrad v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Elwood Trust Co. v. FritzIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.