Legal Opinion

Burk v. Hill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Erom tlie Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Complaint in two paragraphs, to recover the possession of land.. The first paragraph is in the statutory form; the second sets forth the title of the complainant. Answer in general denial. Trial by the court, finding fqr appellee, and, over a motion for a new trial and exceptions reserved, judgment on the finding. Appeal.

*420The sufficiency of the second paragraph of complaint is questioned by an assignment of error, but the question is not discussed in the briefs of the parties—indeed, it seems to be waived. We therefore dispose of it at once by holding the paragraph good.

The appellee, as…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Horner v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Smith v. DoddsIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Greenup v. CrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Maynard v. WaidlichIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State ex rel. Braden v. KrugIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Wright v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BerkeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Louisville & Jeffersonville Ferry v. NolanIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API