Legal Opinion

Morningstar v. Hardwick

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1892No. 355PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Morgan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, C. J. —

This was an action on a promissory note executed by the appellant to the appellee.

The answer was general denial, with another paragraph alleging that when appellant executed the note she was and yet is a married woman, and the wife of Peter Morningstar j *432that no part of the consideration of said note moved to her, nor did she receive or in any way derive the benefit of any part of the consideration thereof, but the same was executed solely and entirely for a debt and liability of her said husband, and not otherwise, of which appellee had notice at the time of the execution of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bennett v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Rosa v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Arnold v. EnglemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Miller v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. McLead v. Ætna Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKay v. CorwineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Minnis v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Druckamiller v. CoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API